Ella Christiansen's Posts (342)

Sort by

7991341255?profile=RESIZE_584x

After more than six months of struggles amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Hollywood issued a dire message about the state of the movie theater industry — the nation’s cinemas “may not survive” without help.

Groups representing movie studios, theater owners and directors on Wednesday called on Washington lawmakers to provide “specific relief” for film exhibitors, saying that nearly 70% of small and mid-sized theater companies would be forced to declare bankruptcy or go out of businesses without government assistance.

Dozens of famous filmmakers, including Judd Apatow, James Cameron, Greta Gerwig, Christopher Nolan, Jordan Peele, Wes Anderson, Clint Eastwood and Ang Lee, signed a letter calling on the federal government to provide support for the industry, which remains shuttered in much of the country.

The National Assn. of Theatre Owners (NATO), the Washington-based organization that stumps for exhibitors, sent the letter, which was addressed to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) and House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfield). The Motion Picture Assn., the lobby representing the major film studios, joined NATO in signing the letter, as did the Directors Guild of America.

“Absent a solution designed for their circumstances, theaters may not survive the impact of the pandemic,” the industry groups said in the letter. “Cinemas are an essential industry that represent the best that American talent and creativity have to offer. But now we fear for their future.”

Movie theaters slowly began to reopen across the country in anticipation of Nolan’s “Tenet” in the U.S. before Labor Day weekend. But after “Tenet” reported modest domestic box office results, studios including Walt Disney Co. and Universal Pictures have continued to delay big movies, fearing not enough cinemas are open to support expensive blockbusters, and too few moviegoers are ready to return. Last week, Disney moved multiple titles including “Black Widow” and Steven Spielberg’s “West Side Story” to later dates. Warner Bros. shifted “Wonder Woman 1984" from October to Christmas.

Theaters remain closed in markets representing roughly 30% of annual box office sales, including Los Angeles County and New York, the nation’s two biggest locales for filmgoing. Neither jurisdiction has said when theaters may be able to return. That has caused problems for theater chains that need new movies in order to operate profitably. Some have reduced hours to stem losses.

According to the industry groups, 93% of exhibitors saw their revenue plummet 75% or more in the second quarter, compared with the same period of time last year. In the U.S., the theater industry employs 150,000 people, many of whom are part time and hourly. If the status quo continues, two-thirds of those jobs could vanish, the groups warned. “Our country cannot afford to lose the social, economic, and cultural value that theaters provide,” the letter said.

The industry leaders called on the elected officials to respond by allocating unspent funds from the CARES Act, the stimulus package President Trump signed into law in March, to programs designed for industries including movie theaters. They also suggesting enacting additional measures such as the RESTART Act, a Congressional bill that would help venues and other businesses by extending and bolstering the Paycheck Protection Program.

“These solutions would fulfill Congress’ intent in helping severely distressed sectors of the economy and ensure that our resources are focused on the industries that need them the most,” the letter said.

 

Article by: Ryan Faughnder for the LA Times.

Read more…

7987850491?profile=RESIZE_584x

Gyllenhaal will play Robert Evans in the feature from Barry Levinson.

Oscar Isaac is set to play director Francis Ford Coppola, while Jake Gyllenhaal will play former Paramount studio head Robert Evans in a movie about the making of Coppola's seminal feature The Godfather.

Barry Levinson will direct Francis and The Godfather, which is based on a Black List script by Andrew Farotte that was redeveloped with Levinson.

The feature will chronicle the battles between Coppola, who was 31 at the time, and Evans, which included taking a gamble on casting Marlon Brando, who had not had a hit in years, and a then-little-known Al Pacino.

“Out of the madness of production, and against all odds, a classic film happened," said Levinson.

Coppola added: “Any movie that Barry Levinson makes about anything, will be interesting and worthwhile!”

Echo Lake Entertainment’s Mike Marcus, Doug Mankoff and Andrew Spaulding are producing along with Kevin Turen, Jon Levin and Baltimore Pictures’ Jason Sosnoff.

Endeavor Content is handling worldwide rights with FilmNation.

Isaac — repped by WME, Inspire and Goodman Genow — was last in theaters with the final installment of the recent Star Wars trilogy, Rise of Skywalker, and will next be seen in another big-budget studio feature — Dune, which is due out in December. He will next start production on the HBO limited series Scenes From a Marriage, starring opposite Michelle Williams in a modern retelling of the famed Ingmar Bergman film.

Gyllenhaal, repped by WME and Goodman Genow, was recently in theaters with Marvel and Sony's Spider-Man: Far From Home, and acts as a producer on Netflix's recent release Devil All the Time and Breaking News in Yuba County.

 

Article by: Mia Galuppo for the Hollywood Reporter.

Read more…

7987849092?profile=RESIZE_584x

Issa Rae has consolidated her entertainment production ventures for feature film, television and digital under the recently launched Hoorae media company, Variety has learned exclusively.

Formerly Issa Rae Productions, Hoorae includes HBO’s “Insecure” and “A Black Lady Sketch Show.” Rae received Emmy nominations for comedy series and best actress in a comedy series for “Insecure” and best variety sketch series for “A Black Lady Sketch Show.” Hoorae’s slate includes “Tre Cnt” and the “Seen & Heard” docuseries for HBO, as well as “Rap S—” for HBO Max, “Perfect Strangers” for Spyglass, “Ghost in the Machine” for Netflix and “Sinkhole” with Monkeypaw and Universal.

“Sinkhole,” based on Leyna Krow’s short story about a mysterious sinkhole, was announced in July as a potential starring vehicle for Rae, who will also produce along with Jordan Peele. Rae came aboard “Perfect Strangers” in December as a producer, writer and star for the English-language adaptation of Paolo Genovese’s Italian feature film “Perfetti Sconosciuti.”

Rae has also promoted veteran executive Sara Rastogi to senior vice president of development and she will report to Montrel McKay, president of Hoorae film and TV. ColorCreative, the management company run by president Talitha Watkins and chief operating officer Deniese Davis, will also be under the Hoorae umbrella along with Raedio, the audio company run by president Benoni Tagoe. Raedio is a music label in partnership with Atlantic Records.

Rastogi got her start in the industry at DreamWorks Studios before moving over to Scott Free as an assistant and was promoted to creative executive. She was then brought over to 20th Century Fox and moved over to Columbia Pictures, where she built the feature residency program.

“Working with Issa, Montrel and the whole team has been refreshing and rewarding,” Rastogi said. “Issa invests in people and has cultivated an empowering company culture that allows us to take big risks, challenge ourselves, and industry norms. I am excited to continue growing with the company, in short Hoorae!”

 

Article by: Dave McNary for Variety.

Read more…

7987847854?profile=RESIZE_584x

Night Shyamalan, the director of “The Sixth Sense” and “Glass,” is teaming with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris’ campaign on a filmmaking contest designed to help get out the vote.

The campaign is reaching out to would-be Spielbergs to submit a 90 second-long short film about casting their ballot in the upcoming national election. Contest participants are being asked to answer a few targeted questions such as: Why are you voting? How are you voting? Who do you want to encourage to vote? What’s your voting story?

“This is such a historical moment that we’re in and everyone has a crucial part to play,” Shyamalan said in a statement. “Storytelling is at the nucleus of it. We need more (honest) stories about why people are voting or why they may be reluctant to vote. I’d like to be a catalyst for those stories to be told and hopefully inspire change as a result.”

Shyamalan will review the entries along with members of the Biden-Harris campaign staff to pick three films that will “showcase impact, authentic storytelling and give a clear call to action on voting.” Presumably no extra points will be given for delivering one of Shyamalan’s signature twist endings.

Winners will get a chance to participate in a virtual meet-up with Shyamalan to talk about art, film and politics. Their videos will be promoted online by the campaign, as well.

Shyamalan was raised and still resides in Pennsylvania, which is considered to be a key, must-win swing state for Biden’s presidential campaign. The competition is being announced a day after Biden’s first debate against Donald Trump, a clash during which the sitting president called the election rigged while the former vice president attempted to defend the integrity of voting by mail.

Videos can be uploaded directly or shared on Twitter or Instagram with the hashtag #VoteByNight. The deadline for submissions is Oct. 12.

 

Article by: Bret Lang for Variety.

Read more…

7987840477?profile=RESIZE_584x

An independent study confirmed media reports that Berlinale founder Alfred Bauer was a key figure in Nazi film propaganda and that, after World War II, he deliberately lied about his involvement with Hitler's regime.

The Berlin Film Festival has come clean about its founder, Alfred Bauer, acknowledging the man who launched Germany's premier cinema event 70 years ago had close ties to the Nazi regime and was a key figure in Joseph Goebbels' propaganda efforts.

The festival on Wednesday announced the findings of an independent study it commissioned with the Leibniz Institute for Contemporary History to look into Bauer's past. It found that Bauer's role in the Nazi's propaganda efforts "was more significant than previously known and was systematically covered up by him after 1945."

Bauer, who died in 1986, served as an advisor to the Reichsfilmintendanz, the body set up by Propaganda Minister Goebbels to direct official film policy under the Nazi government and make sure German movies were in accordance with Adolf Hitler's racist and antisemitic ideology. The new study, conducted by Dr. Tobias Hof, revealed that Bauer was a devoted Nazi. He signed up to various National Socialists organizations as early as 1933, the year Hitler took power, and, in 1937, officially joined the Nazi party.

In his work for the Reichsfilmintendanz, Hof concludes, Bauer "contributed to the functioning, stabilization, and legitimation of the Nazi regime." During Bauer's time with the Reichsfilmintendanz, the division authorized such films as Veit Harlan's Kolberg (1945), a war drama meant to encourage the German population to fight the Allies to the last man. A Nazi file on Bauer calls him a "devoted" member of the SA, the Nazi Party's original paramilitary wing.

After the end of World War II, Bauer covered up his involvement, Hof found, "through deliberately false statements, half-truths, and claims and instead constructed an image with which he presented himself as an opponent of the Nazi regime."

It worked. Bauer was able to continue his career in the German film industry and when Oscar Martay, a film officer of the U.S. Army stationed in Berlin, persuaded the American military to fund the first Berlin Film Festival in 1951, he picked Bauer to run it. Bauer remained the Berlin Film Festival director through 1976.

For decades Alfred Bauer was held up as an emblem of the Berlin festival's supposed core values of openness and tolerance. Following his death in 1986, Berlin named a new award, the Alfred Bauer Prize, in his honor, recognizing work that "opens new perspectives on cinematic art."

But new revelations about Bauer's past, first reported in German newspaper Die Zeit in February this year, just ahead of the 70th Berlinale, sparked a reassessment of his legacy. The Alfred Bauer Prize was dropped (it has been replaced with a new, neutrally-named Silver Bear honor) and Berlin commissioned the independent study.

"The new and now scientifically researched findings about Alfred Bauer's responsibilities in the Reichsfilmintendanz and his behavior in the denazification process are startling," said Berlinale executive director Mariette Rissenbeek. "Nevertheless, they constitute an important element in the process of dealing with the Nazi past of cultural institutions which were founded after 1945. The question, therefore, arises as to which personnel-oriented continuities shaped the German cultural scene in the post-war years. The new knowledge also changes the view of the founding years of the Berlinale."

 

Article by: Scott Roxborough for the Hollywood Reporter.

Read more…

7987834458?profile=RESIZE_584x

More than half a year after it scored top prizes at the 2020 Sundance Film Festival, the first look at Lee Isaac Chung’s highly anticipated family drama, “Minari,” is finally here.

On Wednesday, A24 released an emotional trailer for the film, which stars Steven Yeun, Yeri Han, Yuh-Jung Youn, Noel Cho and Alan Kim as a Korean American family that moves to Arkansas in the 1980s to start a farm.

“We said we wanted a new start,” Yeun’s Jacob tells his wife, Monica (Han), in the clip. “This is it.”

The trailer sees loving parents Jacob and Monica fight to provide for their children in the face of growing adversity as they adjust to life in rural America, characterized by stunning pastoral landscapes and unforgiving elements.

“They need to see me succeed at something for once,” Jacob says, tending to the land.

Highlighted prominently in the preview is Kim, who stole hearts at Sundance as the spunky 7-year-old David — seen goofing off with his father and sassing his grandmother in lighthearted moments.

“Grandma, you’re not a real grandma,” he says matter of factly. “They bake cookies! They don’t swear! They don’t wear men’s underwear!”

Based on writer-director Chung’s own childhood, “Minari” wowed crowds and judges alike at Sundance, where it won both the audience award and the United States dramatic grand jury prize — a feat achieved only by seven other films since the audience award was added to the festival in 1989. The film does not yet have a theatrical release date.

“Remember what we said when we got married?” Jacob says at the end of the trailer. “That we’d move to America and save each other?”

“I remember,” says Monica.

 

Article by: Christi Carras for the LA Times.

Read more…

In films like “Memento” and “Inception,” the director’s time shifts and intricate action require careful calibration by editors, stunt performers and others.

7983898880?profile=RESIZE_584x

“Tenet” is only the latest film by Christopher Nolan to play with time and complicated action. “Inception,” “Dunkirk” and the Dark Knight installments all aimed for new heights in tightly coordinated suspense and spectacle. But how do the makers of these mind-boggling films pull it all together?

The mastermind is unquestionably Nolan, but he is not alone. The multiple narratives, the military-grade action set pieces, the unforgiving studio production schedules all demand masterminds in addition to the director.

I spoke with a few of the filmmaker’s collaborators, past and present, to understand what it takes to make his visions a reality — or an unreality, as the case may be.

The Editing

The pause-and-rewind premise of “Memento,” starring Guy Pearce, left, and Joe Pantoliano, required careful editing to show a few seconds of a previous scene but not much more.

The pause-and-rewind premise of “Memento,” starring Guy Pearce, left, and Joe Pantoliano, required careful editing to show a few seconds of a previous scene but not much more.

Twenty years ago, “Memento” made Nolan a director to watch and introduced his penchant for slicing and dicing narrative. Dody Dorn was the Academy Award-nominated editor of the hit, which recounted in reverse the story of an amnesiac caught up in murderous intrigue. Dorn had to assemble Nolan’s clockwork mystery for audiences who didn’t know what to expect.

Her work in “Memento” underlined the importance of psychological purpose behind Nolan’s approach. “The point of view and the lack of information that you get by telling a story out of chronological order allows you to empathize with the main character, Leonard,” Dorn said. Not knowing the extent of Leonard’s violent actions and motives leaves us open to understanding this conflicted figure. When his vigilantism is revealed, the puzzle carries an emotional payload beyond the frisson of a mere twist.

In “Memento,” that meant replaying a few seconds of the previous scene, but not a second too much.

In films like “Inception,” starring Leonardo DiCaprio, left, the director aims for the sense of a secret world being slowly revealed.

In films like “Inception,” starring Leonardo DiCaprio, left, the director aims for the sense of a secret world being slowly revealed.

“We absolutely have to make sure that people know they’ve gone backwards in time, but you don’t want to bore them with displaying the same material for very long if there’s no new information,” Dorn said. This balancing act is also noticeable in the orienting dialogue of “Inception,” for example, or the relentless time-keeping of “Dunkirk.”

As a point of comparison, Dorn mentioned another director who is known for innovative editing: Paul Greengrass, who shook up the Jason Bourne series with splintered perspectives. To Dorn’s eyes, Greengrass’s approach is “more prismatic,” whereas Nolan’s is “visceral in the frame, rather than visceral in the editing.”

It’s a subtle but intriguing distinction between Greengrass’s sensation of being in the moment, and a Nolan world that has a secret order being slowly revealed.

The Action

“The Dark Knight,” with Christian Bale, and other Nolan productions rely on in-camera stunts.

“The Dark Knight,” with Christian Bale, and other Nolan productions rely on in-camera stunts.

Dorn edited one more Nolan feature, “Insomnia,” but longer collaborations are more typical. Lee Smith has been the editor on many Nolan projects, orchestrating their multilevel crosscutting. Wally Pfister was the cinematographer on seven of his films, including “Memento” and “Inception” (2010), for which he won an Academy Award. But also key to these action-heavy movies is the stunt coordinator, George Cottle.

Cottle began as a stuntman and drove the Batmobile through all manner of chaos in the “Dark Knight” movies. His role as coordinator is critical because Nolan prizes practical effects and in-camera stunts over computer-generated imagery as a way of creating the sense of physical bodies moving through actual space.

Nolan’s most eye-opening sequences have a bravura quality along with rising and converging tensions, and Cottle maintains the energy on the ground. He presents the filmmaker with ideas for particular moves and choreography in fight sequences, and receives step-by-step guidance from the director.

“For a fight in ‘Tenet,’ he might say, ‘Look, in this part of the movie, John David is really coming into his own. So I just want to see full-on aggression, but I want a moment of weakness here, and then I want him to come back strong at the end. Maybe 20 to 25 seconds,’” Cottle said, referring to the main character played by John David Washington. He singled out the film’s Mumbai building-jumping sequence as especially nerve-racking.

Since these elaborate scenes can end up on huge Imax screens, the team also learns to adjust shots for audience comprehension.

“With that size of screen, we had to hold on shots for a little longer,” Pfister, the cinematographer, said. “When you’re watching this in such an immersive fashion, you need time to scan the screen.”

“And if it was going to be a really quick cut,” he said, “I needed a little more light to see things better because it’s only going to be on the screen for a fleeting moment.”

Many large productions use a separate filmmaking crew, a second unit, that can operate independently on action scenes. But Nolan prefers to direct those sequences himself. The resulting team, Cottle and other collaborators said, has a certain esprit du corps.

“There is a real sense when you’re on set with him that Chris is the headmaster and everybody else is working to keep the headmaster happy,” Cottle said.

The System

Figuring out how to shoot around the tides in “Dunkirk” fell to the first assistant director, Nilo Otero.

Figuring out how to shoot around the tides in “Dunkirk” fell to the first assistant director, Nilo Otero.

A Hollywood veteran, Nilo Otero has been first assistant director for Nolan’s movies since “The Dark Knight” (2008). It’s a behind-the-scenes role that doesn’t receive much attention, but its existence frees up the filmmaker to do his job. Otero breaks down the script for Nolan’s review, and that can entail working out shooting days, wrangling actors and even scheduling around the ocean tides.

“You see all those guys on that beach in ‘Dunkirk,’ right? That beach disappears twice a day. OK, now schedule that!” Otero said. “The pier is a really great set, but nevertheless an obvious set once you look at it when the tide is low.”

Otero views Nolan as a rarity when it comes to blockbusters: an old-school filmmaker who can attend to all facets of production rather than specializing and who still prefers shooting with a single camera. (“I don’t know if they’re the biggest little movies in the world or the littlest big movies in the world, but it’s like you had an unlimited student film,” Otero said, approvingly.) Nolan’s level of involvement helps give his films a personal stamp, unlike some major studio productions.

It also means that the usual Hollywood waltzes can break a little differently. Take, for example, hashing out actor availability.

Nolan on the set of “Dunkirk.” He films action sequences himself rather than hand off the job to a second unit.

Nolan on the set of “Dunkirk.” He films action sequences himself rather than hand off the job to a second unit.Credit...Melinda Sue Gordon/Warner Bros.

“During preproduction, I get calls from people’s agents: ‘Oh, my client can’t possibly work this time.’ I’ll go to Chris, and he’ll say, we’ll recast. No problem,” Otero said. “It’s unheard-of. I can hear the jaw hit the floor on the other end of the phone.”

Nolan is not the only studio-friendly filmmaker who can keep to a schedule, but there is a notable intensity to his focus and pace. “Chris would shoot a $200-million-plus movie like ‘Tenet’ at the same speed they would shoot an episode of TV,” Cottle said. “It’s unbelievable.”

Cottle has worked on other franchises that rely more heavily on digital effects. For him, both approaches have value, but Nolan’s has a grounded energy that’s distinct.

“The CGI is incredible, but it ultimately ends up that it’s some guy sitting in front of a computer, generating it like a cartoon,” he said. “And there’s a big difference between that and what we do.”

 

Article by: Nicolas Rapold for the New York Times.

Read more…

7983893285?profile=RESIZE_584x

The first installment earned $1.65 billion globally for Disney.

More Lion King is on the way, courtesy of director Barry Jenkins. The Oscar-winning Moonlight filmmaker will helm a prequel to Disney's 2019 hit. Lion King scribe Jeff Nathanson has penned a draft of the prequel.

Jon Favreau directed the first installment, a remake of the 1994 animated classic. It used innovative techniques to create photorealistic animals and African landscapes and voice starred Donald Glover as Simba and Beyoncé as Nala. It became a massive hit, earning $1.65 billion globally for Disney.

“Helping my sister raise two young boys during the '90s, I grew up with these characters. Having the opportunity to work with Disney on expanding this magnificent tale of friendship, love and legacy while furthering my work chronicling the lives and souls of folk within the African diaspora is a dream come true,” said Jenkins in a statement.

Jenkins earned a screenwriting Oscar for 2017 best picture winner Moonlight, which he directed, and was also nominated for his screenplay for his directorial follow-up, 2018's If Beale Street Could Talk. He recently wrapped filming on the Amazon limited series The Underground Railroad.

Nathanson's credits also include Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales (2017) and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008) for Disney.

 

Article by: Aaron Couch and Borys Kit for the Hollywood Reporter.

Read more…

7983874894?profile=RESIZE_584x

 

The nonprofit, co-founded by Robert and James Redford, has announced grants to nearly two dozen films, tripling its support compared to 2018.

The Redford Center, the nonprofit environmental media organization co-founded in 2005 by Robert Redford and his son James Redford, is going big on funding environmental documentaries this year. Today, it announced early-stage funding of a record 22 feature-length films committed to telling stories of environmental justice and solutions. Made through the Redford Center’s biennial Grants Program, it represents a tripling of the number of films funded in its previous cycle.

“The Redford Center mandate is really to drive mass participation in the movement towards environmental justice, protection and repair, and we are scaling up right now,” Redford Center executive director Jill Tidman tells The Hollywood Reporter. She says the center felt it was urgent to increase funding given events of 2020. "The open call happened right when shelter-in-place really started in a big way in this country. We decided given the state of the film industry and production and the uncertainty of it, we really wanted to make sure we would help get some content created,” says Tidman. “We decided we’d do a big fundraising blitz this summer and bring on as many projects as we could possibly fund.”

The Grants Program operates on a two-year cycle. Sixteen of the selected films will receive $20,000 cash grants and a suite of GoPro gear, while six mini-grant winners each will receive $1,000 cash grants. All of the filmmaking teams get wrap-around support from the Redford Center, including networking and partnership opportunities, guidance on creating impact campaigns around their films, and promotional support. Films are also eligible to receive additional funds during year two to bring projects across the finish line. “We typically stick with the projects through the project life. We see them as part of our work,” says Tidman. “Year two is when we try to build that community around them, shepherd it along and work on that impact strategy.”

This year’s crop of grantees includes projects that focus on a wide variety of issues, including food security, climate solutions, environmental toxins, community health, racial justice, civic participation, indigenous wisdom and rights, and endangered habitat and species protection.

“We’re trying to expose the intersectionality of environmental justice, racial justice, economic justice and gender justice. And the films we’ve selected this year do a lot of that work,” says Tidman. “They meet people where the impacts happen in their communities and in their lives. And that’s probably the most exciting thing for me about the group this year.” The films, she says, represent an opportunity to invite in “far more people and a more diverse group of people into the movement.”

The slate of films is set in such diverse locales as Puerto Rico (post-Hurricane Maria); West Virginia; Florida (on the trail of the state’s threatened panther population); California (suffering wildfire devastation); the American Southwest (where old uranium mines have contaminated the Navajo Reservation); Maine (documenting the building of a seaweed farm) and Borneo (home to one of three species of orangutans, all of which are critically endangered.)

The lead funder of the center’s Grants Program is the The New York Community Trust. Additional support comes from KindHumans and GoPro For A Cause and additional production funding in 2020 comes from Janice and Matthew Barger, Shari and Dan Plummer and the Pisces Foundation. The Grants Program was started in 2016, giving funding to six projects, with another seven receiving funds in 2018, including the film Inventing Tomorrow which was the recipient of a 2019 Peabody Award. The Center also runs a storytelling project for middle-school students, The Stories Project, and produces its own original films, which have included 2008’s Fighting Goliath: Texas Coal Wars, 2012’s Watershed, and 2017’s Happening: A Clean Energy Revolution.

Tidman’s hope is that the films they are helping fund can inspire others to become active in the movement to improve the life and health of the planet. “We do narrative intervention work,” she says. “The way we do storytelling is trying to insert a progress story into the narrative, whether through impact partnerships, educational curriculum or community screenings.”

She adds that, “The data show that more people than ever are concerned about what’s going on with the planet. At the same time, most people don’t know what to do about it. I think the environmental communications to date have been very overwhelming and create a lot of paralysis. I have a whole document of doom-y headlines that are basically we’ve hit the point of no return. No wonder there’s a hopelessness. That’s the core of why we haven’t been able to make some of these shifts. It’s actually a problem of culture change. So we have to create the will to make the right policies and elect the right leadership. Our focus as a storytelling organization is always to both present the issue at hand and also present the solutions and a pathway for action.”

The full list of 2020 grant recipients follows:

 

Food for the Rest of Us

Tiffany Ayalik (Producer, Writer), Caroline Cox (Director)

Feature Film

Food for the Rest of Us will examine how getting back to the land is tied to other movements such as Black Lives Matter, Idle No More and Times Up.

Stage: Post Production

 

We Still Here / Aquí Estamos

Eli Jacobs-Fantauzzi (Director)

Feature Film

In response to the government's disregard and poor relief management during Hurricane Maria, young residents from Comerio, Puerto Rico activate themselves by taking control and transforming not only their lives but their community.

Stage: Production

 

Impossible Town

Meg Griffiths and Scott Faris (Directors)

Feature Film

Impossible Town is the story of unlikely heroine Dr. Ayne Amjad and her quest to relocate the 250 residents of Minden, West Virginia, to her own remote property so they can live free of the toxic contamination that threatens their community with extinction. It is a mission her father began 30 years ago, and in light of his untimely passing, one that she must complete in the face of infighting, pandemic, and overwhelming odds.

Stage: Production

 

Untitled Annie Mae Aquash Documentary

Amy Kaufman (Producer), Yvonne Russo (Director)

Feature Film

Indigenous activist Annie Mae Aquash is one of the thousands who make up the staggering number of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls. An unprecedented investigation into her murder becomes a critical focus in examining the continuing fight for Indigenous sovereignty as well as effects of centuries of colonization on Indigenous women and girls.

Stage: Production

 

Fork in the Road

Vivian Sorenson and Jonathan Nastasi (Directors)

Feature Film

What we eat matters. Fork in the Road is a documentary about mitigating climate change through our culinary choices. We follow the stories of renegade farmers who use regenerative growing practices and visionary chefs who are creating a new climate cuisine — the heroes who are forging a resilient and delicious future of food.

Stage: Production

 

Path of the Panther

Carlton Ward, Jr. (Cinematographer), Tori Linder (Impact Producer), Eric Bendick (Director)

Feature Film

Path of the Panther is an epic tale of nature and humanity at a crossroads. Through the eyes of the Florida panther, we discover the beating heart of a lost wilderness. Yet the guardians of this species are in a desperate struggle. The abyss of extinction beckons — and time is running out. Walking this path reveals both hope and heartbreak — a timeless battle waged between forces of renewal and destruction. Lines drawn. Territory marked. But whose dominion is this? The future of the Panther, and of our planet, may rest on the answer.

Stage: Post Production

 

Harvest

Natalie Baszile and Hyacinth Parker (Directors)

Limited Series

Harvest, a character-driven docuseries, focuses on the unique circumstances and passions of farmers around the globe, and offers an intimate look at their lives and realities. Taking the lens that is usually trained on chefs and foodies, Harvest celebrates the beauty and artistry of farming and the people who act as stewards of the land at a pivotal moment when mankind is grappling with our food sources and re-examining our relationship to the earth.

Stage: Early Development

 

The Last Fire Keepers

Jacob Thomas (Producer), Benjamin Huguet (Director)

Feature Film

Every year California is devastated by gigantic wildfires as the effects of global warming increase, but the re-emergence of an ancient indigenous practice offers hope of a solution.

Stage: Development

 

Police in our Climate

Khari Slaughter and William Tyner (Directors)

Feature Film

This film follows the lives of four families who live at the intersection of environmental and police violence. From their collective wisdom, the film will explore ways to build climate-resilient communities free of police violence and brutality.

Stage: Early Development

 

Razing Liberty Square

Katja Esson (Director)

Feature Film

Razing Liberty Square is a feature-length documentary that addresses climate gentrification by following the redevelopment of a historic African American public housing project in Miami and its impact on long-time residents.

Stage: Post Production

 

OAKLEAD

Alex J. Bledsoe (Director)

Feature Film

In Oakland, California — where lead poisoning rates are higher than Flint, Michigan — families fight to protect their children from their own homes and schools, confronting over a century of environmental racism.

Stage: Development

 

To The End

Sabrina Schmidt Gordon (Producer), Rachel Lears (Director)

Feature Film

At this critical and volatile moment in our history, stopping climate change is a question of political courage, and the clock is ticking. To the End will follow the Green New Deal from an obscure idea to a political touchstone of a generation, through the interwoven narratives of four young women of color who are grappling with challenges of leadership and power that they have never encountered before.

Stage: Production

 

Appalachian Spring

Shannon Post, Evan Mascagni (Director)

Feature Film

The story of a vision to transform coal country into farm country, Appalachian Spring follows a group of Kentuckians on a journey to create a sustainable future for a spirited community in economic decline.

Stage: Early Production

 

Demon Mineral

Dr. Tommy Rock (Co-Writer), Hadley Austin (Director)

Feature Film

Demon Mineral documents life in the radioactive desert on the Navajo Reservation. Spanning across a landscape perforated by orphaned uranium mines in Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah, the film follows a group of indigenous scientists, elders, and activists as they work to protect a vital living space on contaminated land.

Stage: Early Production

 

Hollow Tree

Monique Walton (Producer), Chachi Hauser (Producer), Jolene Pinder (Producer), Kira Akerman (Director)

Louisiana through the eyes of three young women coming-of-age at different points along the Mississippi River. Here, the river is at record flood stages, hurricanes are occurring earlier each year, and the coast is losing over a football field of land an hour. The young women's journey reveals that flooding and land loss often do not occur arbitrarily, but as the result of intentional decisions that value profit over people. As they learn about how the Mississippi River has been managed and controlled, Mekenzie, Annabelle, and Tanielma come to identify with the river and their individual search for identity and meaning becomes connected to their new climate reality.

Stage: Rough Cut

 

Manzanar, Diverted: When Water Becomes Dust

Ann Kaneko (Director/Producer) Jin Yoo-Kim (Producer)

From the majestic peaks of the snow-capped Sierras to the now parched Eastern California valley of Payahuunadü, “the land of flowing water,” Manzanar, Diverted: When Water Becomes Dust poetically weaves together memories and insights of intergenerational women from three communities. Native Americans, Japanese American World War II incarcerees, and environmentalists form an unexpected alliance to defend their land and water from the insatiable thirst of Los Angeles.

Stage: Post production: rough/fine cut

 

CURRENT 2020 MINI-GRANT RECIPIENTS:

 

Aina Momona

Sergio & Elena Rapu (Directors)

A small farm in Hawaii leverages its unique relationship with a resort to create a new model of local agriculture in a state that is heavily reliant on imported foods.

 

RICO

Lindsay Ofrias and Gordon Roecker (Directors)

When a group of Amazonian villagers set out to remedy one of the largest oil spills in history, they never expected to face charges of organized crime in the United States for their action. RICO is the untold story of how, after winning a landmark multibillion-dollar lawsuit, these villagers and their international allies became legally branded as part of a conspiratorial plot against a major U.S. corporation. As the story unfolds in real time, RICO shows precedent in the making that has serious implications for democracy, the environment, and communities across the world.

 

Salt Sisters

Heidi Burkey (Director)

Off the coast of Maine, America’s environmental and addiction crises meet at a crossroads as Colleen Francke leads a team of women in recovery from substance-use disorder building a seaweed farm in Casco Bay. Facing opposition from local fishermen, risking financial stability, and fighting through her own recovery journey, Colleen will discover what it takes to lead these women into a new coastal economy — rehabilitating both the water and themselves along the way.

 

Biruté

Toby Gad (Director)

She was believed missing in the Bornean jungle when 25-year-old UCLA graduate Biruté began what will soon be the longest primate study by an individual in human history. "Love and grief, heartbreak and triumph, journey with Biruté deep into the heart of the rainforest, and discover the disappearing Eden she has devoted her life to defending."

 

A Park in Brooklyn

Kurt Vincent and Irene Kim Chin (Directors)

A nature film about human nature, A Park In Brooklyn is a meditative portrait of one of America’s greatest city parks, Prospect Park in Brooklyn, New York. Through the intimate stories of people whose daily lives intersect with the Park, the film illuminates how diversity makes an ecosystem stronger and healthier.

 

"IZ"

Jennifer Akana Sturla (Director)

The unknown story behind the Hawaiian singer whose cover medley “Somewhere Over the Rainbow/What a Wonderful World” is known around the world.

 

Article by: Degen Penerfor the Hollywood Reporter.

Read more…

Talking language, racism and progress in Hollywood and the Oscars.

7983866854?profile=RESIZE_584x

With Hispanic Heritage Month currently underway, and this year’s awards season just clearing its throat, it’s worth examining the contributions that Latinos have made in the industry. More importantly, how those contributions have been interpreted with the Academy in its 92-year history. While it’s easy to point out the many shortcomings (and there are many) that the Academy has made, they are only a small piece of the problems at hand. #OscarsSoWhite has been a hot-button topic since its birth following the 2014 nominations, and the Academy has been used as the scapegoat for Hollywood’s less inclusive issues. While AMPAS can own part of it, my long-held philosophy has been “they can’t vote for what’s not there.”

Speaking about race in any setting or publication is uncomfortable. Discussion about race is supposed to be difficult as there are decades of pain, ignorance and prejudices tied to it and must be unraveled. As one of the few full-time Latino (and Black) journalists employed in this space, I would be remiss to not use this opportunity to educate and speak to industry professionals and readers about these deficiencies. To get to the Dolby Theatre stage, you have to travel through each integral piece of the Hollywood machine, but that isn’t the starting point. There’s a cultural divide, an internal civil war in the Latino/a/x community that has prevented our voices from being fully heard and accepted. This battle has pitted Latinx brothers and sisters against one another on the brow of three major disputes: language, ethnicity and where you come from (and no, those are not the same thing).

We bicker about the way we say words in our language, or if we even speak our language. Too many times I’ve heard “you’re not a real Puerto Rican” due to not being fluent in the native tongue. We fight about the introduction of the word “Latinx” and whether it’s a term that we should adopt when referring to one another because we have a “masculine” language. We even challenge one another about what culture had it “tougher” along the way. Dangling qualifiers are placed upon each other, and that’s before we even make it to Tinseltown.

To engage with one another, we have to educate with a basic 101-type of a lesson on who we are and what the terms “Hispanic” and “Latino” mean. In the United States, the two terms are used interchangeably, which is incorrect. Hispanics refer to people who descend from Spanish-speaking populations, including Spain, a white European country. Latinos (or if preferred, Latinas or Latinxs) applies to those descended from Latin America, including Brazil. Put merely, Hispanic is tied to language while Latino is bound to geography.

“You’re splitting hairs,” you might say. In the battle for equality, it matters because of the misconceptions the terms provide to Hollywood on the progress that is being made for Latinos on screen.

In 2018, following another occurrence of #OscarsSoWhite, Brooks Barnes, a Hollywood reporter for the New York Times, published a piece titled “After #OscarsSoWhite, Hispanics Seek Their Hollywood Moment.” Barnes, a white journalist, does his best to speak up for a population that has been grossly underrepresented in the Academy. While utterly appreciated, he frames his analysis and presents the two terms interchangeably. He writes, “the last Hispanic actor to win an Oscar was Penélope Cruz, from Spain, who was honored nine years ago for her supporting role in ‘Vicky Cristina Barcelona.'”

While he describes Cruz’s ethnic roots correctly, near the top of his piece, Barnes writes, “…the minority group that Hollywood excludes the most onscreen — Latinos — is trying to create its own bullhorn moment.”

Actors like Javier Bardem and Penélope Cruz are talented and should be celebrated for their wins, but they are not Latinos. As Spaniards (or los españoles), they have given a false pretense of progress in Hollywood.

The U.S. created these labels and has created and continued the confusion. Even Latinos, like myself, have been pre-wired to use them whenever we see fit. In a time where we are honoring and respecting the preferred and correct pronouns of individuals, Latino, Latina, Latinx, Hispanic, Afro-Latino, Afro-Latina, Latin@, Spanish, or any inclusive and progressive description is something that we must begin to respect.

Looking through Academy history, there have been only four Latino winners in the acting categories: José Ferrer (1950’s “Cyrano de Bergerac” in best actor), Benicio del Toro (2000’s “Traffic” in supporting actor), Rita Moreno (1961’s “West Side Story” in supporting actress) and Anthony Quinn (1952’s “Viva Zapata!” and 1956’s “Lust for Life” in supporting actor). Born Manuel Antonio Rodolfo Quinn Oaxaca in Chihuahua, Mexico, Anthony Quinn is just the tip of the iceberg, that shows Latinos need to “cover” or “hide” the more recognizable ethnic parts of their names to succeed in the business.

In 2006, Mexican director Alejandro González Iñárritu was nominated for best picture and director for his film “Babel.” That year was dubbed “the most international and diverse Oscar ceremony ever.” Forest Whitaker, Will Smith, Djimon Hounsou, Eddie Murphy, Adriana Barraza, Jennifer Hudson and Rinko Kikuchi were all among the acting nominees. Eight years later, the “Babel” director returned to the Oscar ceremony but with a “marketing tweak” on his nominated and eventual best picture-winning film “Birdman.” Alejandro González Iñárritu was now “Alejandro G. Iñárritu” and has remained billed as such ever since. He won three Oscars at the 2015 ceremony, and then again the next year for “The Revenant,” only the second director in history to win back-to-back directing prizes.

Did Iñárritu’s name change make a difference in the perception of voters and audiences? Can’t say for sure, but it’s interesting to see the most Latino sounding part of his name axed in the latter part of his career, and all of a sudden, major success follows. It’s a too-often seen trend that Hispanics and Latinos make in order to “make it.” Oscar Isaac (born Hernandez) and Martin Sheen (born Ramón Gerard Antonio Estévez) have done so, but it doesn’t make them bad people, nor do we fault them for it. Does “Oscar Hernandez” get to play the pivotal role in “Inside Llewyn Davis” under that name? Does “Ramón Gerard Antonio Estévez” get to star as Josiah Bartlett in the long-running and beloved “The West Wing?”

Two disappointing moments seen this year was when Warner Bros.’ “In the Heights” and 20th Century Studios’ “West Side Story” exited the calendar year and moved to 2021. With their departures, the possibility for an abundance of Latinx representation in the Oscar races plummeted. So without Rachel Zegler, Anthony Ramos, Ariana DeBose, Rita Moreno, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Gregory Diaz IV, Olga Merediz, Jimmy Smits and more, the chance for Latinx acting nominees at the 2021 Oscars seems (at the moment) nil.

What is genuinely preventing the unity within the community is something that people are very fearful of debating. The instances of colorism and racism in the Latinx culture will be the single greatest hindrance for our acceptance if we do not tackle it head-on.

On my mother’s side, they proudly hail from Loiza, Puerto Rico, the northeastern part of the island. History shows that in the 1600s, Spain instructed slaves to be sent to the region of Loiza. If you visit the municipality today, it is home to the largest Black population on the island, better known as Afro-Latinos. If you see other areas of the island, you may hear some locals say that Loiza is “where the ‘negritos’ live.” The word “negrito” literally translates to “little Black man.” Depending on your Spanish dialect and language, some say it is not a racial slur; instead, a term “affectionately used by many Puerto Ricans to refer to their children, whether they be of light or dark complexion.”

Ask anyone who grew up in Loiza, or is darker-skinned, including my mother, when someone used the term with them, they may offer a more “contrary” definition.

It’s too reductive and oversimplified to see a Puerto Rican, or any Latinx as just from one part of the world. “It’s complicated,” says J. Don Birnam, a Mexican freelance film journalist. “People want to generalize because it’s easier. How do you try to generalize 500 million people who come from different parts of the world?”

We get to celebrate Alfonso Cuarón, Guillermo del Toro and Iñárritu winning Oscars but at this juncture, it seems the skin tone must be “just right, in order to win the fight.” Afro-latinx is sorely missing from television and movie screens. Netflix’s teen-drama “On My Block” is one of the only current shows that represent the rainbow of colors in the Latinx society. We can only hope for more and for people to see the multiple parts of the varying countries that flow through our blood.

Unfortunately, when Latinx people rightfully speak out about the lack of representation it can be read as an “anti-Black” sentiment. Earlier this year, John Leguizamo boycotted the Emmys due to any Latinx actors receiving acting nominations.  He received backlash when he tweeted, along with an LA Times article stating, “Why can’t we Latinx have a piece of the pie? We are the largest ethnic group in America and missing as if we didn’t exist!”

Critics and casual entertainment enthusiasts pounced and quickly pointed out Jharrel Jerome’s historic win the year prior for “When They See Us,” a mini-series in which Leguizamo co-starred and received an Emmy nomination himself. Jerome is Dominican and identifies as Afro-Latino, and is just the second Latinx actor to win an Emmy award in any of the lead categories (America Ferrera was the first for “Ugly Betty” in 2007).

One interesting observation in the Academy landscape is a larger tally of Latinx in categories like production design. Six winners in 18 individual nominations are a much better showing than the others previously mentioned. Which begs the question, “why are we good enough to build your sets, but not good enough to be in front of your cameras?”

The Academy’s announcement of diversity standards and representation was for all groups to benefit. We don’t make progress by just taking care of our own. We do it by taking care of each other. There are so many more voices that need to be lifted in these spaces. Let the conversation continue.

 

Article by: Clayton Davis for Variety.

Read more…

Christopher Nolan’s latest film bears the hopes of an industry desperate to get people back in theatres, but grandeur is no guarantee of impact.

7983865255?profile=RESIZE_584x

Word has it that Christopher Nolan’s new film, “Tenet,” is hard to understand. Not so. It’s a cinch—no more difficult than, say, playing mah-jongg inside a tumble dryer, while the principles of quantum mechanics are shouted at you in fluent Esperanto. In case that feels too easy, Nolan fiddles with the sound mix of the movie, thus drowning out important conversations. If you thought that Bane, the villain in Nolan’s “The Dark Knight Rises” (2012), verged on the inaudible, wait for the folks in “Tenet.” Most of them make Bane sound like Julie Andrews.

The protagonist of the new film is listed in the end credits as “The Protagonist,” denying us a handhold on his identity. If only he were called Rodney or Little Merv. Of his background we know next to nothing, though I happen to love that lack; one sure sign of an action hero is the trading of personal history for present cool. Hence the opening sequence of “Tenet,” in which the Protagonist—played by John David Washington, whose nonchalant intensity lent such verve to “BlacKkKlansman” (2018)—is tested for initiative and spunk during a terrorist attack on an opera house in Ukraine. Who are the attackers, what do they want, and what’s our guy doing there? Search me. The point is that, having aced the test, he is given his next task. Think of it as “Mission: Indecipherable.”

The nuts and bolts of the assignment are laid out by a scientist named Barbara (Clémence Poésy). We know that she’s a scientist, because she wears a white coat; either that, or she’s a fishmonger who moonlights in techno-ballistics. She shows the Protagonist a gun that sucks bullets out of their target and back into the chamber—a feat of amazingness that is triggered neither by magnetism nor by magic but by a reversal of time. Barbara describes the bullets as inverted. “Someone’s manufacturing them in the future,” she says, looking a bit glum. Maybe she just got bad news from 2050.

 Anyway, here’s the scoop. A Russian arms dealer, Sator (Kenneth Branagh), is trading not in regular weapons but in what Barbara calls “the detritus of a coming war.” One way to get to that detritus—chunky whatchamacallits that somehow enable chronological slippage—is via Sator’s willowy English wife, Kat (Elizabeth Debicki), who regards him with fear and loathing but is forced, for the sake of their young son, to stick around. The Protagonist’s plan is as follows: make nice to Kat, and take it from there. Anyone who saw the TV adaptation of John le Carré’s “The Night Manager,” in which a secret agent had to drift into the orbit of a wealthy arms dealer (whose English girlfriend was played by, yes, Elizabeth Debicki), will know the territory. Look out for large yachts.

“Tenet” is a two-hundred-million-dollar charm bracelet, strung with one shiny set piece after another. If some of the charms are slightly tarnished, it may be because we’ve seen their glitter before. Sator, being a rich daredevil, races his catamaran at such a lick that it almost flies over the waves, but then so did the title character in “The Thomas Crown Affair” (1999). And, while it’s always refreshing to see a 747—a real one, not a model—trundle grandly into an airport building and burst into flames, the sight of 007 preventing similar mayhem, by the merest squeak, in “Casino Royale” (2006), was no less fun. As for the vehicle chase along a freeway, with some drivers trying their luck against the flow of traffic, well, although Nolan stages the chaos with his usual thunderous panache, I couldn’t help reflecting that, for Jason Bourne, heading the wrong way up a busy road is pretty much a daily commute. So, what’s new? 

The answer is that the vehicles impeding the Protagonist are—brace yourself—travelling in the opposite direction through time. (If you crash into someone from the past, don’t even think about calling your insurance company. Just pay up.) Such is the Möbius strip into which this movie twists itself, and, rather than getting tangled up in it, you might as well sit back and enjoy the discombobulating show. Wrecked buildings rear up and self-repair before your eyes; explosions funnel down and taper to nothingness. What’s curious, however, is that grandeur is no guarantee of impact. The climax, in which two military forces lock horns in a bleak Siberian quarry, one of them fighting forward and the other fighting backward, or something, is less memorable than the all-too-human bafflement that you glimpse on the Protagonist’s face when muddy water, caught in a miraculous anti-splash, slurps back from his boot onto the ground. All those special effects, piled high like Christmas presents, and what stays with you is a puddle.

Through no fault of its own, “Tenet” has become a Brian of a film. In other words, it is a decent, generous, and far from perfect entity that has been lumbered with the duties of a messiah. Being the first blockbuster to be released for public viewing since the reign of covid-19, it bears with it the hopes of an entire industry. Will people rise from their couches and, having weighed their craving for collective entertainment against the risk to their health, flock once more to the pictures?

Time will tell—although time, as “Tenet” demonstrates, should not be trusted. As of September 3rd, it is showing in all but five states, New York and California being two of the five. The cavernous imax auditorium in London in which I saw the movie was decidedly unthronged; of more than seven hundred seats, roughly a tenth were occupied. Studio accountants will soon gather, muttering, around the box-office returns, like ancient priests inspecting the entrails of a sheep. What will count, in such eager divination, is not “Tenet” alone but the competing figures for Disney’s “Mulan,” which, forgoing a theatrical release, will be streamed into the living rooms of American viewers, at thirty dollars a pop.

What if “Mulan” cleans up, and “Tenet” falls on its ass? Might other filmmakers not cut their losses and switch their loyalties to the small screen—that homely and unmysterious shrine, where nobody needs to sanitize? One could argue that, given a year or two, and a vaccine, we will return to our ticketed seats and our sodas, but I can all too easily imagine a permanent failure of our nerve. The idea of mustering in the dark, among strangers, staring up at a bright screen, and watching a story unfold has been around for only a century and a quarter, and our faith in it has been waning for decades; maybe covid-19 will complete the process. Some habits, once broken, are never resumed. 

Either way, whether “Tenet” winds up as the savior of cinema or as the portent of doom, it’s the right film for the job. It both gleams with high-concept modernity and gazes hungrily back at earlier moviegoing joys. The old visual thrill, long muted by mass tourism, of seeing beautifully dressed characters hop from one location to the next receives a peculiar boost, in these quarantine-ridden days, from Nolan’s extravagant plot; O happy Protagonist, swanning from London to Mumbai, Tallinn, and the Amalfi Coast just when the rest of us can’t! The lushest spectacle of all is that of Robert Pattinson, who plays the Protagonist’s very British sidekick. He has a master’s in physics, a firm grasp of the Estonian language, and a forelock for which the past and the future might well, with good reason, go to war. Ellen Page, with her sportive smile, brought a leavening amusement to Nolan’s “Inception” (2010), and Pattinson, loucheness incarnate, does the same for “Tenet.”

The problem that dogs this film is not its complexity. Indeed, many fans will delight in unpicking the clever clues that stitch the tale together. No, what strikes you is how determinedly bare of feeling it seems, even when emotional opportunities present themselves. Thus, the Protagonist is drawn to Kat, and you want them to want each other, yet his efforts to rescue her from her fiend of a husband, though noble, have a procedural rather than a passionate air. That dryness reaches into the smallest nooks of the narrative; gold bars, for instance, tumble from the belly of the 747, clinking on the asphalt, but when you think of the comparable moment at the end of Stanley Kubrick’s “The Killing” (1956), in which stolen banknotes are strewn beside a plane, what you recall is the robber’s agonized expression, as his ill-gotten gains swirl away like moths in the night. No such agony ever troubles “Tenet.” 

Above all, there is Barbara’s instruction, as she ushers the Protagonist into the wonders of temporal inversion. “Don’t try to understand it. Feel it,” she says to him. The echo is clear: “Do not try to understand. Just believe.” That is what the hero of Cocteau’s “Orpheus” (1950) is told as he prepares to pass through a mirror into the underworld. Like Nolan, Cocteau sprinkles his film with reverse-motion images, but each one of them gives off a lyrical shimmer, and when a dead woman, lying on a bed, is ordered to rise, her body springs to the perpendicular as if reborn, and the hearts of viewers lurch and lift in response. Although “Tenet” is dazzling and deft, rarely does it pause, as “Orpheus” does, to savor the strangeness of its own creations. Does Christopher Nolan flinch from what he might find there, like someone afraid to analyze his dreams? Maybe he hasn’t got the time. 

 

Article by: Anthony Lane for the New Yorker.

Read more…

7979516089?profile=RESIZE_584x

Northern California filmmakers have been at the forefront of the #BlackLivesMatter era, delivering works that address racism and exploring the complexities of what it means to be Black in America.

Here are but six such features that have regional ties, all available for rent or purchase online.

“Fruitvale Station”:

Ryan Coogler’s solemn, cinema verite 2013 feature debut speaks louder and louder over time. It chronicles the final hours in the life of Oscar Grant, a 22-year-old Oakland man shot dead on New Year’s Eve Day by a BART officer on the Fruitvale platform. Coogler — an Oakland native — creates a compelling human story out of an American tragedy, counting down the life of a young man (a powerful breakout performance by Michael B. Jordan) trying to pull his life together. It is one of the best films of the last decade. 

“The Hate U Give”:

Shockingly underappreciated, George Tillman Jr.’s intense adaptation of Angie Thomas’s YA novel (inspired by the Oscar Grant shooting) couldn’t be more fiercely topical. “The Hate U Give” centers on a Black teen girl who witnesses a friend get shot dead by a white police officer during a routine traffic stop. San Francisco native Audrey Wells, who died of cancer the day before the film was released, should have received an Oscar nomination for her audacious screenplay. Amandla Stenberg is a force as Starr Carter, the teen who seethes and suffers from PTSD over the murder of her friend. Also of note is Oakland’s Russell Hornsby as Starr’s caring but angry father. Demands to be seen. 

“Blindspotting”:

Some critics took issue at how this Oakland-set tale of two East Bay buddies tackled too much — gentrification, racism, police shootings, friendships and white privilege, among other hot button issues. Hogwash. Co-screenwriters and costars Daveed Diggs and Rafael Casal — longtime pals and collaborators in real life — create a hip-hop cinematic experience tied to the beat of a vibrant city that confronts these issues, and more, every day. Carlos Lopez Estrada directs with energy and style.

“Sorry to Bother You”:

Oakland icon Boots Riley delivers an absurdist mind blower starring Lakeith Stanfield (in a golden performance) as Black telemarketer whose career gets a major boost when he follows the advice of a co-worker (Danny Glover) to use his “white voice.” Riley’s debut film is a frisky, surreal, innovative and ultimately shocking romp with messages galore about racism, exploitation and privilege.

 “The Last Black Man in San Francisco”:

David Talbot’s debut feature feels almost like a stage play, a love story to a San Francisco that is being gentrified out of existence. Anchored by two award-worthy performances from Jimmie Fails — who co-wrote the screenplay — and Jonathan Majors, “Last Black Man” is ostensibly about two S.F. friends, one of whom seeks to reclaim his family home and its treasured memories. I love this film.

“Black Panther”:

Oakland’s Coogler scores again with this historic, beautifully made Marvel superhero feature featuring a largely black cast, Afro-centric themes and heartfelt nods to Oakland. Coogler and S.F. co-screenwriter Joe Robert Cole create a magical setting in Wakanda, a mythical country that celebrates African heritage and achievement. Equally impressive is how Coogler makes the female characters strong, on equal standing with the men. Chadwick Boseman stars as the titular hero. Michael B. Jordan, Lupita Nyong’o, Danai Gurira, Daniel Kaluuya and Letitia Wright round out an all-star cast. The fact that the film opens and closes in Oakland (even if it’s not the Oakland) is part of the reason why Coogler’s film goes far beyond the standard superhero flick.

 

Article by: Randy Myers for the Daily Democrat.

Read more…

7979461685?profile=RESIZE_400x

The season premiere is already sold out, but a number of tickets set aside for health care workers are still available.

The 46th season of Saturday Night Live premieres this week — and the show will be performed in front of a live audience once again.

During the onset of the novel coronavirus pandemic, SNL did a few remotely produced shows at the end of last season. However, for this Saturday's show, the cast and crew — along with a live audience — will be back in Studio 8H. However, tickets to the show's dress rehearsal and live show come with a long-list of health stipulations.

For starters, all ticketed guests will be required to take a mandatory COVID-19 test upon arrival, according to the SNL ticket site. "This is a self-administered lower nasal antigen test with results yielded before the show," the instruction reads.

In addition to that test, temperature checks will also be required at check-in and approved masks will be required at all times while inside 30 Rockefeller Plaza.

What's more, all audience members will be asked a series of questions prior to admission, such as, "Are you exhibiting any symptoms related to COVID-19?", "Have you exhibited any symptoms to COVID-19 in the last 14 days?", and "Have you been in close contact with anyone with COVID-19 symptoms, or anyone who has tested positive for COVID-19, within the past 14 days?" among others, according to the site.

Any ticketed member with a temperature of 100.4 or higher will not be allowed admission and their party may not be granted admission either, the site states, adding, "A positive COVID-19 test for any member of your group will result in the entire group not being granted admission."

SNL is allowing people to request tickets for themselves and anyone in their "social bubble," which can include as many as eight other people.

That may all sound like too much for some. However, the Oct. 3 premiere's dress rehearsal and live show are sold out. Still, there are a number of tickets set aside for health care workers, which are still available.

 

Article by: Ryan Parker for the Hollywood Reporter.

Read more…

7979460489?profile=RESIZE_584x

As with other creative industries, the film business is reeling under the impact of coronavirus. Crews are struggling to shoot, cinemas are severely restricting audience numbers, studios have been forced to delay releases and film festivals have been largely driven online. In this climate, the awards season – traditionally seen as the driver of artistic excellence as well as the repository for the industry’s vital quotient of glamour – is taking a battering.

In usual times, autumn marks the time when the awards season is in full swing. After the summer blockbusters, heavyweight awards contenders announce themselves with glittering film festival premieres at Venice, Toronto, Telluride, New York and London, films nail down release dates to ensure eligibility for the awards (the traditional cut-off point for the Oscars is 31 December), and stars jet in to hold in-person Q&As with awards voters to cajole vital slivers of support.

 I think the 2021 awards might be a better reflection of what’s good … rather than a load of so-so films with big stars and huge marketing budgets

But the coronavirus has changed all that. The Oscars ceremony has been pushed back to April 2021 to allow films to obtain a cinema release in a US where cinemas remain largely shut, and films premiering on streaming services will be eligible – previously complete anathema – so long as a physical release is planned. It is still unclear what a major awards ceremony will look like: the recent Emmy awards were conducted over Zoom, and the impossibility of assessing social distancing regulations at this distance means it is not possible to plan. Even before the pandemic, awards ceremonies were battling audience fatigue, with the Oscars’ TV ratings reaching an all-time low earlier this year, despite a number of tweaks such as shorter running time and a hostless show.

Crisis, however, can mean opportunity. For Anna Smith, host of the Girls on Film podcast, the disruption to the release calendar may signal an improvement in quality. “Obviously it’s hard to say how long productions will be delayed down by the crisis,” she says. “But for example there do seem to have been a remarkable amount of fantastic films by female directors in the past six months, with the likes of Rocks, Clemency, Babyteeth, Make Up and Saint Frances. A silver lining to the crisis has been seeing all the media space given to those amazing indie films when it might have otherwise gone to a big budget studio blockbuster. And that will surely have an impact in awards season.”

Sterling K Brown in the studio at the 72nd annual Emmy awards. Photograph: ABC/Rex

Charles Gant, box office and awards editor for UK film industry publication Screen International, also points out that while the awards themselves still attract considerable attention from the media and the wider audience, it’s essentially the televised ceremony that is suffering. “People are clearly not finding the TV shows interesting – and why would you? In the current TV landscape, it’s much harder to make a film awards show compelling.”

Even in the current climate some films have managed to break through. Nomadland, a study of the generation of retirees affected by the 2008 recession starring Frances McDormand and directed by Chloé Zhao, has won two big film festival prizes, the Venice Golden Lion and the Toronto people’s choice award, elevating a low-budget film to serious-contender status. Period romance Ammonite, starring Kate Winslet as 19th-century fossil hunter Mary Anning, has also done well from its selection to the suspended Cannes film festival and largely virtual edition of Toronto.

All this is happening at a time that the awards season is frantically trying to reinvent itself to achieve greater relevance to the outside world. On Thursday, the British Academy of Film and Television Arts, which gives out the annual Bafta film awards, published a landmark report containing numerous rule changes to promote diversity in its award nominees – over the lack of which it was severely criticised in January. Inspired in part by Bafta’s reforms, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which oversees the Oscars, has also introduced a series of measures to overcome similar accusations. These are part of a wider campaign to overcome discrimination in the film industry – a problem which, according to director Steve McQueen, is significantly worse in the UK than in the US, with a string of “diversity standards” spearheaded by the British Film Institute struggling to make headway.

Is the awards season worth defending in the age of Covid? Gant points out that films such as Nomadland would find it much tougher to get off the ground otherwise. “As difficult as it is to get film like Nomadland made in the first place, without the awards it would be almost impossible. Integral to its DNA is that its backer can launch an awards campaign around it, and become part of the conversation for several months. Awards create opportunities for a certain type of quality film-making.”

Corrina Antrobus, co-founder of the Bechdel Test Fest, agrees. “We need to keep standards high and celebrate art. Awards motivate film-makers to keep working and provide further opportunities when awards are won.” But she feels it’s vital not to get distracted from diversity. “It’s important to audit the issue at a forensic level as to why only one group of people seem to be coming up trumps; who, why and how are these decisions being made? There are many facets to this question and it’s up to the awards bodies to dig deep.”

Smith also sees reasons for optimism, and sees awards ceremonies as a key part of the industry’s route to survival. “I think that 2021 awards might be a better reflection of what’s actually really good,” she says, “rather than a smattering of the good stuff and a load of so-so films with big stars and huge marketing budgets. But like everyone in the industry, I am concerned about the future of film and I applaud awards bodies for taking steps to make themselves more relevant. They are a big part of driving audiences to cinemas.”

 

Article by: Andrew Pulver for the Guardian.

Read more…

7979459483?profile=RESIZE_584x

The Cannes Film Festival may have been canceled this year, but organizers still plan to honor the 2020 Official Selection via a three-day event.

The Palais des Festivals will host a ‘Special Cannes’ event, which runs Oct. 27-29 and will feature four films from this year’s Official Selection, as well as in-competition short films and the Cinéfondation’s school films. The event will be open to the public. Meanwhile, a jury will award the Palme d’Or for short films and the Cinéfondation prizes.

“The collection of four films from the Official Selection, the short film competition, the film school competition, and the dinners and meetings epitomize the happiness we’ll all feel to be together in Cannes in October,” said festival director Thierry Frémaux. “The films of the Official Selection are currently playing to cinemagoers in France, in Europe and throughout the world. It’s a great sign to see them making a stopover in Cannes, before we turn our attention to the 2021 season.”

Organized with the Cannes City Council, the mini festival will open with “Un triomphe” (The Big Hit!) by Emmanuel Courcol, with star Kad Merad in attendance along with other cast and crew. It will conclude with Bruno Podalydès’ “Les Deux Alfred” (The French Tech), with the director attending along with lead actor Sandrine Kiberlain.

Also screening are “Asa Ga Kuru” (True Mothers) by Japanese director and Cannes regular Naomi Kawase, as well as “Beginning,” the debut by Georgian director Dea Kulumbegashvili, which won the Concha de oro for best film at the 68th San Sebastián International Film Festival.

Pierre Lescure, president of the Festival de Cannes, said, “We are as delighted to see the festival hosted by the Cannes City Hall in October as we were sad not to have enjoyed its company in May. Thanks to this collaboration, films from the Official Selection will be shown on the Croisette. This is our way to be in Cannes, alongside its population and all the professionals with whom we work hand in hand every year.”

David Lisnard, mayor of Cannes, added: “We wanted the presence of the Festival de Cannes in 2020 to symbolize our fight on behalf of the events sector, which provides a living for hundreds of families, as well as the cultural impact for our city. It was imperative therefore that the Festival show up in Cannes for this extraordinary event, which respects all the usual rules: quality screenings in front of a regular audience, in evening dress, on the famous red carpet.”

Elsewhere, Cannes has also confirmed the dates of next year’s festival as May 11-22.

 

Article by: Manori Ravindran for Variety.

Read more…

 

7979458465?profile=RESIZE_584xLast November, a group of suing Disney employees demanded the opportunity to conduct a statistical analysis of pay data to prove gender disparities that they allege occur throughout the studio's workforce. It turns out that Disney had already hired consultants in 2017 to study the issue. On Friday, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled that as part of the ongoing lawsuit, Disney would have to disclose more information on the communications and documents related to this pay equity study.

According to the judge's decision, the decision to hire the outside consulting firm of Willis Towers Watson was made by Shawna Swanson, an associate general counsel at Disney. The consultant's study then kicked off a discussion among 33 Disney employees, most of whom worked in the Human Resources and Compensation departments.

The plaintiffs in the case — a number of women who say they are paid less than men who perform similar work — have been attempting to compel documents related to the study. In a motion, they asserted that these documents "would tend to show that Disney systematically discriminates against female employees, and that the discrimination is knowing and willful."

Disney responded that it wasn't trying to keep "secret" any information and that the underlying pay data was discoverable, but that the analysis was covered by attorney-client privilege. Disney added that there was no evidence that any of this was disseminated widely or prepared for any purpose other than legal advice. For example, the defendant said the consultants weren't engaged to advise on an internal investigation, PR strategy, business product or day-to-day operations.

In an order, L.A. Superior Court Judge Daniel Buckley appears skeptical of Disney's arguments.

While he hasn't yet decided whether these documents are privileged or not, Buckley does note that Swanson spontaneously requested the study "without any prompting or direction from her 'client,' Disney" and then failed "to provide any legal advice to her corporate 'client.'"

The judge then goes through chapter and verse on when there's no presumption of confidentiality before deeming Disney's privilege logs to be insufficient.

"While Defendants adequately explain that their in-house counsel enlisted the aid of Compensation and HR personnel for purposes of obtaining the data and information necessary for WTW to conduct its analysis (that the in-house attorneys used to provide legal advice), that explanation holds little water with respect to communications that occurred only between non-attorneys after Defendants received WTW’s final deliverable," writes the judge. "Moreover, that the after-the-fact communications occurred only between non-attorney personnel and executives, including sometimes exclusively between individuals that were not privy to initial receipt of the analysis from WTW, further indicates the potential non-privileged business purpose of those communications.”

Meaning, even if the 2017 pay equity study itself is off limits to the women suing Disney, there could very well be communications within Disney triggered by the study that could become evidence in the case. What's more, even when Disney's in-house lawyers were on the email chain, if the communications don't include legal opinions, the judge appears to be open to the possibility that these emails could become non-secret too. For now, Disney must at least outline each of the documents being withheld. A further decision on whether these documents are truly privileged figures to come later.

Finally, Buckley also rules that Disney must give up its agreement with the consulting firm. States the judge in his order, "Even assuming a retention agreement between an attorney and client is privileged under California law, it does not follow that an attorney’s (or even a client’s) agreement with an outside consultant or analyst is similarly privileged."

 

Article by: Eriq Gardener for the Hollywood Reporter.

Read more…

7979457697?profile=RESIZE_584x

The eccentric described by Roger Ebert as "the most creative screenwriter of his generation" reflects on abandoning acting for filmmaking, his creative process and why 12 years elapsed between his first and second live-action directing gigs.

"'Projective tests' are psychological tests," says Charlie Kaufman — a man once described by Roger Ebert as "the most creative screenwriter of his generation," having earned Oscar recognition and spots on the WGA's 2005 list of the 101 greatest movie screenplays ever written for 1999's Being John Malkovich, 2002's Adaptation and 2004's Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind — as we record an episode of The Hollywood Reporter's Awards Chatter podcast and I ask him why he named his production company Projective Testing Service.

"Rorschach is the most well known example," the 61-year-old continues. "They're kind of ambiguous images that are shown to people, and their reaction is the thing that tells you who they are or tells you what their issues are or something like that. So I thought it was kind of interesting, because that's sort of my philosophy about any kind of art — that when you create something, it exists as a conversation between the person who created it and the person who's interacting with it. And so that's what I try to do with my movies. Which is why I don't want to talk about what they're about to me, because it's kind of irrelevant what they're about to me."

In more recent years, Kaufman has ventured beyond writing scripts for others to direct into directing films from scripts that he has written. He started with 2008's Synecdoche, New York, which Ebert called "the best film of the decade"; then came 2015's Anomalisa, a stop-motion animated film which Kaufman co-directed with Duke Johnson; and the most recent example is I'm Thinking of Ending Things, which he adapted — with major changes — from Iain Reid's 2016 novel of the same name, and which debuted on Netflix on Sept. 4 (less than two months after the publication of Kaufman's acclaimed debut novel, Antkind).

Over the course of our conversation, Kaufman discusses what led him to abandon his passion for acting to pursue writing and directing; what his writing process is, and how each of his scripts evolved; why 12 years elapsed between the first live-action film that he directed, Synecdoche, and the second, I’m Thinking of Ending Things; and much more.

 

Article by: Awards Chatter from the Hollywood Reporter.

 

Read more…

7963133453?profile=RESIZE_584x

The director of the Netflix film, which stars Sacha Baron Cohen, Jeremy Strong, Eddie Redmayne and Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, reveals why it took nearly 20 years to get the project about the politically motivated prosecution of protestors made and why it couldn't be more timely: "I never imagined today would go so much like 1968."

In October 2019, hundreds of protesters marched down Chicago’s Michigan Avenue toward the Hilton, chanting phrases like "No justice, no peace!" and "A people united will never be defeated!" as police in riot gear descended on the crowd with billy clubs and tear gas. Earnest and energized, clad in 1960s period costumes and flanked by vintage police vehicles, this group thought they were acting out the past, staging a scene from Aaron Sorkin’s The Trial of the Chicago 7. As it turned out, they were performing the future, too.

Sorkin’s film, which opens in select theaters Sept. 25 and hits Netflix on Oct.  16, tells the story of the riots at the 1968 Chicago Democratic National Convention and the circus-like trial of political activists that followed the next year. Thanks to Hollywood development hell, the movie is arriving 14  years after Steven Spielberg first mentioned the idea to Sorkin but just as its themes and plot points — civil unrest, a self-proclaimed "law and order" president’s vilification of protesters (Nixon then, Trump now), the police’s excessive use of force, tensions within the Democratic Party over how far left to move — have become bracingly current.

"I never wanted the film to be about 1968," Sorkin says in an interview over Zoom from his house in the Hollywood Hills on Labor Day weekend. "I never wanted it to be an exercise in nostalgia or a history lesson. I wanted it to be about today. But I never imagined that today would get so much like 1968."

For only the second time in a career spanning nine films as a screenwriter, Sorkin serves as director with Chicago 7, helming a sprawling ensemble cast that includes Eddie Redmayne as anti-war activist Tom Hayden, Sacha Baron Cohen as Youth International Party (Yippie) provocateur Abbie Hoffman, Succession’s Jeremy Strong as counterculture figure Jerry Rubin and Watchmen’s Yahya Abdul-Mateen II as Black Panther party co-founder Bobby Seale. There are undeniable parallels not only between the film and the present political moment but also between the performance-art activism of the actors and the men they’re playing, most vividly Cohen, who, like Hoffman, has made a career of political self-expression through comedic stunts, including crashing a far-right rally in Olympia, Washington, this summer while pretending to be a racist country singer. (Cohen, who shoots most of his satirical projects incognito, impishly calls reports of his appearance at the rally  "fake news.")

Eight months after Sorkin filmed the protest scenes in Chicago, Abdul-Mateen was marching in Black Lives Matter protests in West Hollywood, as was Strong in Brooklyn. "There’s power when a lot of people come together to protest out of anger, out of frustration," Abdul-Mateen says. "Everybody has a role in the revolution; this film shows that."

Though the movie feels crafted for this political moment, it was born of another. At Sorkin’s first meeting with Spielberg, "I remember him saying, 'It would be great if we could have this out before the election,'" Sorkin says. The election Spielberg was talking about was 2008’s, when Barack Obama and Joe Biden faced John McCain and Sarah Palin.

The film hit multiple roadblocks, beginning with the 2007-08 writers strike and continuing as financing faltered repeatedly, a fate illustrated by the more than 30 producers who can claim some sort of credit on Chicago 7. It took another unscheduled detour this summer after Sorkin finished it as the pandemic worsened, and the odds of original distributor Paramount mounting a successful theatrical release before the Nov. 3 election seemed increasingly slim. For some involved with the film, there is a question about the ethics of Hollywood inviting audiences to return to theaters before a COVID-19 vaccine is widely available. "There’s a moral quandary that we, the motion picture business, have to be careful that we don’t become the tobacco industry, where we’re encouraging people to do something we know is potentially lethal," says Cohen.

Before his visit to Spielberg’s Pacific Palisades home to discuss the project on a Saturday afternoon in 2006, Sorkin knew next to nothing about the Chicago 7. The federal government had charged seven defendants — Hoffman, Rubin, Hayden, David Dellinger, Rennie Davis, John Froines and Lee Weiner — with conspiracy for their participation in the protests against the Vietnam War outside the Democratic National Convention. (Originally the men were known as the Chicago 8 and included Seale, who asked to have his trial separated from that of the others and postponed so that he could be represented by his preferred lawyer, who was ill; that trial never took place.) When Spielberg proposed a movie about the riots and the trial that followed, Sorkin, who was 7 in 1968, said, "'You know, that sounds great. Count me in.' As soon as I left his house, I called my father and said, 'Dad, do you know anything about a riot that happened in 1968 or a crazy conspiracy trial that followed?' I was just saying yes to Steven."

Despite his ignorance, Sorkin was a logical choice to write the project: Having penned Broadway’s A Few Good Men and its 1992 film adaptation as well as the long-running NBC series West Wing, he’d shown a flair for dramatizing courtroom procedures and liberal politics, and he turned in his first draft of the Chicago 7 script in 2007. Originally, Spielberg planned to direct the project himself, but by the time the writers strike was over, he had moved on and a number of other potential directors circled, including Paul Greengrass, Ben Stiller, Peter Berg and Gary Ross, though none was able to get it off the ground. "There was just a feeling that, 'Look, this isn’t an Avengers film,'" Sorkin says of the studios' move away from midbudget dramas and toward action tentpoles in the 2010s. "This isn’t an easy sell at the box office. And there are big scenes, riots, crowd scenes. How can this movie be done for the budget that makes sense for what the expectation is at the box office?"

As the project languished, Sorkin tried writing it as a play, ultimately spending 18 months on a fruitless effort to fashion a stage treatment. "What I didn’t like was having a script in my drawer," he says. "I was just thinking, 'Jeez, this is a good movie and it feels like it’s stillborn.'"

It was the confluence of two events that ultimately revived the film with Sorkin in the director’s chair in 2018 — the 2016 election of Donald Trump and the 2017 release of Sorkin’s well-received directorial debut, Molly’s Game, which doubled its production budget at the box office. "This is before George Floyd and Breonna Taylor and police protests or confrontations," Sorkin says. "This is just when Donald Trump was musing nostalgically about the old days when they used to carry that guy [a protester] out of here on a stretcher and punch the crap out of him."

With Trump’s throwback rhetoric lending the subject matter a new timeliness and Sorkin’s directing chops confirmed in Spielberg’s eyes, the movie moved forward with its screenwriter at the helm.

Cross Creek Pictures came in to finance, and Paramount bought the domestic rights. But all those years in development had left an expensive imprint on the project — a jaw-dropping $11  million had been spent on casting costs, producing fees and the optioning of Brett Morgen’s 2007 documentary about the event, Chicago 10, leaving just $24  million for the actual 36-day production.

One way Sorkin attempts to achieve a sense  of scope despite that budget is by intercutting real black-and-white news footage with his dramatized protests. He rounded out his large cast with a deep bench of experienced and award-winning actors including Oscar winner Mark Rylance as defense attorney William Kunstler, Oscar nominee Frank Langella as Judge Julius Hoffman, Joseph Gordon-Levitt as prosecutor Richard Schultzand, Oscar nominee Michael Keaton as former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark — with the filmmaker and many of his actors working for scale. (Abdul-Mateen and Strong both became first-time Emmy winners Sept.  20.)

Sorkin shot the protest scenes on location in Chicago and built a courtroom set in an old church sanctuary in Paterson, New Jersey, because none of the available courtroom locations in the Garden State conveyed the scope he wanted. "If we’re saying the whole world is watching, I want a packed courtroom for six months full of press and spectators," Sorkin says. "I wanted the big, cavernous feeling of the federal government and its power coming down on these people."

Among the vestiges of Spielberg’s original plan was the casting of Cohen as Hoffman, which required the London native to affect a Boston accent and return to a subject he had studied as an undergraduate at Christ’s College in Cambridge, where he wrote a thesis paper about Jewish activists during the civil rights movement. At 19, Cohen had interviewed Bob Moses, the leader of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, which Hoffman was involved in before he founded the anti-war Yippie movement. "Honestly, I was very proud of the fact that Jews were involved in the Black civil rights movement in the '60s, and there wasn’t much written about it," Cohen says, explaining his youthful scholarship.

There’s a clear line to draw between Hoffman’s 1960s theatrics — which included throwing fistfuls of money into the gallery of the New York Stock Exchange and vowing to levitate the Pentagon — and Cohen’s contemporary TV and film pranks. Perhaps among Cohen’s most memorable and pointed gags was getting Vice President Dick Cheney to gleefully autograph a waterboard kit, which the comic did while posing as an admiring Israeli anti-terror expert for a 2018 episode of Who Is America?, his Showtime series. “What I wanted to do was to show that he was proud of torturing," Cohen says. "I could not believe how happy Cheney was to be sitting next to an uber-fan. So, yes. Ultimately in the shows and the movies that I do, I’m trying to be funny, but yeah, I’m trying to get out the anger that I have within me."

Cohen sees Hoffman’s unorthodox protest methods as pragmatic. "The Yippies were underfunded, and he was using theatricality to gain attention for his aims," Cohen says. "He wanted to stop the war. And how do you do that? You use stunts and absurdist humor to try to effect change." The actor estimates that, after researching Hoffman, he pitched Sorkin hundreds of lines the activist had really delivered. "As an annoying person with a lot of chutzpah, I was emailing Aaron every other night until morning, 'What about this line? What about this line?'" Cohen says. The writer-director, known for his exacting prose, politely tolerated the suggestions while largely sticking to his own script.

As Rubin, Strong is playing Hoffman’s conscientious jester sidekick, a role wildly different from the tragic, wealthy approval seeker he portrays on Succession. Strong added some of his own dramatic flourishes, including painting words on his chest for one courtroom scene and bringing a remote-controlled fart machine to disrupt Langella’s imperious judge. "I wanted to channel as much as possible that spirit of the merry prankster and of joyous dissent," Strong says. Hoffman and Rubin’s real-life personae were so large that Sorkin at times asked his actors to dial down their faithful portrayals, requesting, after one particularly jubilant take, "less cowbell."

Sorkin’s script draws a sharp contrast between Hoffman and Rubin’s campy methods and Hayden’s more reserved approach to the anti-war movement, with the tensions between Hoffman and Hayden supplying the film’s key relationship in a kind of begrudging brotherhood of the peace movement. To learn more about Hayden, Redmayne studied remarks that Jane Fonda, who was married to the activist and politician from 1973 to 1990, made upon his death in 2016. In his own life, Redmayne is cautious when it comes to discussing the role that he, as an actor at the center of a huge studio franchise (Warner Bros.’ Fantastic Beasts) might have in political life. "I find it endlessly challenging," Redmayne says of navigating his public activism. "There’s the elitist thing. It’s speaking up on climate change but being conscious that you’re traveling a lot. One has to be aware of one’s own hypocrisies, because they can be detrimental to something you believe in. So sometimes I find that I have to live my life and speak to my advocacy in a way in that it’s around friends, family and people I know rather than making something public."

Abdul-Mateen has begun his acting career largely associated with fantastical roles, like Dr. Manhattan on HBO’s Watchmen, Black Manta in Aquaman and Candyman in the upcoming Jordan Peele-produced remake of the slasher film. Playing Seale represented a chance to do more grounded work and to depict a man who had loomed large during Abdul-Mateen’s childhood in Oakland, where Seale co-founded the Black Panthers in 1966 and later ran for mayor. Seale’s inclusion in the original Chicago riots indictment was controversial and strange — prosecutors accused him of conspiring with men he’d never met after visiting Chicago that week for only a few hours to deliver a speech. For the prosecution, Seale functioned largely as a prop to tap into the fears of white jurors and white Americans watching the news coverage, and during the trial he had no attorney. "I wanted to key in on, how did Bobby Seale survive this trial?" Abdul-Mateen says. "How did he survive the gross mistreatment by the United States government, and how did he go through that with his head high and not be broken? It was an exercise in finding my pride, finding my dignity."

In one scene, Seale is brought into the courtroom bound and gagged, and throughout the trial he is kept separate from the white defendants. "Although it was meant to be a humiliating act, I walked out with my chest high, with my head high. Bound and gagged and everything else. It would be very dangerous for a Black man in that time, even sometimes today, to show the proof of the wear and tear that oppression can take on a person, because that can be seen as a sign of weakness, and a sign of weakness is an open door that it’s working." For the moments of lightness that Cohen and Strong bring to the movie, Abdul-Mateen supplies ballast. "It’s important for the right reasons and at the right time to make art that makes people uncomfortable," he says.

Spielberg has remained involved in the film "in an emeritus role," Sorkin says, "from giving me good script notes to casting to notes on early cuts of the film." He also showed up to the New Jersey courtroom set. "When you have to direct a scene in front of Steven Spielberg, you’re not at your most relaxed necessarily," Sorkin says. Spielberg did not, however, take an executive producing credit on the film and declined to be interviewed about it.

The decision to switch to a streaming release came after an early summer marketing strategy call between Sorkin, Paramount chief Jim Gianopulos, other Paramount execs and some of the film’s producers. "At the end of the call, Jim said, 'Listen, we don’t know what the theater business is going to look like in the fall. We have troubling data telling us that the first people back in movie theaters are going to be the people who think that the coronavirus is a hoax,'" Sorkin says. This was clearly not the intended audience for a movie whose heroes are liberal activists. "I said, 'I don’t think the Idaho militia are going to be the first people coming to this movie,'" Sorkin says.

The group agreed to explore alternatives and gave Netflix, Amazon, Apple and Hulu 24 hours to watch the film. After a bidding war, Chicago 7 landed at Netflix in a $56  million deal against its $35  million production budget, with a robust marketing campaign and promise of a theatrical release. "We knew we didn’t have the option of 'Let’s wait a year,'" Sorkin says. "This is what we’re thinking about and what we’re talking about right now, and it just would have been a real shame to not release it now."

After Chicago 7 opens in limited release, Netflix will add more theaters in the U.S. and abroad throughout October, expanding upon the film’s premiere on the service, a strategy akin to what it provided Oscar best picture nominees The Irishman and Roma, albeit in a wildly different theatrical environment.

As Hollywood opens up to more production, Sorkin, and many of the Chicago 7 actors, have begun returning to work. Abdul-Mateen has been in Berlin for The Matrix 4 and Redmayne in London for Fantastic Beasts 3, while Sorkin is shooting a West Wing reunion special at the Orpheum Theatre in downtown L.A. that will premiere on HBO Max in October as a fundraiser for When We All Vote and include video appearances by Michelle Obama, Bill Clinton and Lin-Manuel Miranda.

For the real-life Chicago 7, the denouement consisted of ultimately being acquitted of conspiracy. Judge Hoffman sentenced Seale to four years in prison for contempt of court, one of the longest sentences ever handed down for that offense in the U.S., but those charges were overturned on appeal. Just three of the original eight defendants — Seale, Froines and Weiner — are still alive, but the legacy of the case lives on in contemporary protest movements. "The movie is tribute to the bravery of the protesters of 1968 and the protesters of today in Belarus, on the streets of America, in Portland," Cohen says. "These people now are risking their lives, and they’ll continue risking them."

 

Article by: Rebecca Keegan for the Hollywood Reporter.

Read more…

7963131489?profile=RESIZE_584x

Disney is keeping Pixar's 'Soul' on the 2020 Thanksgiving calendar, while 'Death on the Nile' will also open this year.

In another major reshuffling of its release calendar, Disney is pushing 2020 event pics Black Widow and West Side Story to next year amid challenges posed by the ongoing novel coronavirus pandemic.

Marvel's female superhero pic, starring Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow, had been set to hit the big screen Nov. 6. It will now open May 7, 2021. In turn, Marvel's Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings is being pushed from the May 7 date to July 9, 2021. (Marvel's Eternals also has a new date.)

Steven Spielberg's West Side Story, from 20th Century and Amblin, is being delayed almost an entire year, moving from Dec. 18 to Dec. 10, 2021. Disney isn't giving up its seat at the 2020 Christmas table entirely and is relocating 20th Century's Death on the Nile from Oct. 23 to Dec. 18.

Black Widow's exit from the early November calendar is bad news for exhibitors who need tentpoles as they reopen. One bit of good news for theater owners: Pixar's Soul is sticking to its Nov. 20 theatrical release date, while 20th Century's Free Guy, starring Ryan Reynolds, is keeping its Dec. 11 date. Nor were any of the films mentioned in Tuesday's announcement being sent to Disney+, as Mulan was.

The latest round of changes to Disney's calendar underscores the continuing challenges facing the box office amid the ongoing pandemic, as well as production delays. They also follow the muted box office performance of Christopher Nolan's Tenet in the U.S.

Cinemas in some top markets are not even open yet in the U.S., and there is growing concern about a second wave of COVID-19 cases this fall and winter, both domestically and abroad.

Elsewhere on Disney's calendar, The King's Man is being moved up from Feb. 26, 2021, to Feb. 12, 2021. The latter had been the home of Marvel's Eternals, which is moving to Nov. 5, 2021.

Among 20th Century/Disney titles, The Empty Man is moving up from Dec. 4 of this year to Oct. 23, while Deep Water is being delayed from Nov. 13 of this year to Aug. 13, 2021.

 

 

Article by: Pamela McClintock for the Hollywood Reporter.

Read more…

7963131259?profile=RESIZE_584x

Even as U.S. exhibitors are hurting, some directors are saying quietly that they can't encourage audiences to return to cinemas despite safety protocols added during the pandemic.

The pandemic has some Hollywood filmmakers making an unheard-of plea: "Please don't release my movie in theaters right now." Before the novel coronavirus, a splashy debut on the big screen was the stuff dreams are made of for any director, producer or star.

In recent days, producer Jordan Peele is said to have played a prominent role in the decision to delay Candyman's release from Oct. 23 to next year, worried about encouraging consumers to gather in an enclosed, indoor cinema, sources tell THR. The film, a direct sequel to the 1992 supernatural slasher of the same name, was directed by Nia DaCosta, who co-wrote the script with Peele and Win Rosenfeld. (Peele and Rosenfeld's Monkeypaw Productions made the film for MGM, with Universal handling distribution.)

Cinema safety is a delicate subject as the industry attempts to recover from the shutdown. Theater owners, who are operating at drastically reduced capacity in order to promote social distancing, are spending tens of millions of dollars on enhanced sanitary procedures like improved air ventilation systems. Yet, just as with the general population, opinion within the creative community is divided in terms of activities someone is willing to participate in, or encourage, such as moviegoing.

Insiders stress the decision to move Candyman was squarely made by MGM and Universal, but no studio wants to upset someone as powerful and prolific as Peele. "More and more filmmakers are having these conversations," says one top studio executive. "There's just so much confusion. And there's a spectrum in terms of comfort level." Adds a counterpart at another major: "I'm hoping we'll be in a better place in November and December." (A mid-September National Research Group poll showed that roughly half of moviegoers remained nervous about sitting in a theater.)

Monkeypaw, in a statement to THR, said the Candyman filmmakers "very much want a theatrical release for the film, which is why it has been pushed to 2021. The communal audience experience is crucial for Candyman and, right now, that is not available to everyone due to capacity restrictions and closed theaters. We are simply waiting for a time when all horror fans can have that experience."

The Monkeypaw team didn't provide further comment, but insiders note that African Americans — who have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 — are one of the film's target demos.

Peele is not the only one concerned about the risk to the audience. In a bold move, Aaron Moorhead and Justin Benson have told their fans to not go see their new indie movie, Synchronic, indoors. The duo run the genre label Rustic Films with producing partner David Lawson.

"Due to distribution arrangements that are out of our control, the release of Synchronic into drive-ins and indoor theaters has been confirmed for October 23rd. But we want to be very clear: at the time of writing this, we personally wouldn't go to an indoor movie theater, so we can't encourage you to. To us, this isn't only about feeling safe in a theater, this is also about the scientific community indicating that enclosed spaces like movie theaters are still a hazard for spreading COVID-19 to others," the trio wrote in a Sept. 11 Instagram post.

Sources say Benson and Moorhead asked Well Go USA, the U.S. distributor, to scrub the October date, but quickly learned that if that were to happen, deals with other indie distributors in countries across the globe would have been jeopardized.

While Synchronic is forging ahead in theaters, most movies, like Candyman, have abandoned their fall and early winter movie dates. Cinemas remain closed in a number of key locales, including New York and much of California, pending approval to reopen by local health authorities. Also, the performance of Christopher Nolan's big-budget Tenet has been underwhelming in the U.S. after costing Warner Bros. a hefty $200 million to produce before marketing. Through Sept. 21, the film's domestic cume was a tepid $36 million, compared to $215 million overseas, where theaters have been reopened longer. Days after the movie launched in the U.S. during Labor Day weekend, Warners delayed Wonder Woman 1984 from Oct. 2 to Dec. 25.

In late August, Dr. Joyce Sanchez, an infectious disease expert and director of the Travel Health Clinic at Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin, participated in a briefing organized by the National Association of Theatre Owners outlining CinemaSafe, a set of protocols for the coronavirus era. Sanchez endorsed the voluntary guidelines as a means of greatly mitigating risk but stressed that there are no guarantees.

She now suggests the movie industry go further. "Although there are still no published studies nor media reports linking COVID-19 transmission with going to a movie theater, I am also not aware of any studies that are proactively looking at the question of movie theater risk," Sanchez says. "This missing piece is a huge opportunity for science and industry to continue innovation and collaboration."

In their Instagram post, the Synchronic crew encouraged people to see the film at drive-ins or on video-on-demand in a few months. "If you do go see it in an indoor theater, please adhere to all the guidelines," Moorhead and Benson wrote. "We love and miss the theatrical experience, so let's work together to stop the spread of the virus."

 

Article by: Pamela McClintock for the Hollywood Reporter.

Read more…